Thursday, October 1, 2009

Why Government Healthcare won't help you.

I become increasingly disturbed when I see how many people are willing to except lies about Government Health care, even when the failure of things like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are right in front of their noses.

Many people in the country have come under the impression that health care is a right. Let me first explain what a right is. A RIGHT is something that cannot, again I say CANNOT be denied of you. In every country in the world where socialized medicine has taken hold there has been rationing of care. The government will have to cut spending on whatever care they determine "not needed." This is the government, not you, that is deciding what you need cared for. So if a citizen with stage 4 cancer is looking far coverage for treatment and the government has cut that coverage to decrease spending because that citizen will "die anyway", that is the government denying that care, therefore making it NOT a right if it is able to be denied.

Some may say that it doesn't matter because Health insurance is too expensive anyway. That is because of government regulation. Very cheap insurance plans don't exist because the government mandates companies have to cover certain care, even if the consumer doesn't want it in his or her plan. Also, because the government requires, by law, that even those with no money to pay for care or no insurance, must be treated. This makes hospitals and doctors use equipment and materials that they are not being payed for. This makes the hospitals raise prices to compensate for this. This means insurance companies must pay hospitals more, which in turn makes insurance more expensive.

Some still may say that they cannot receive health insurance when they have lost their job. Again, blame the government. When someone loses their job you will notice that home owner's insurance, car insurance, food, computers, clocks, radios, chairs, and other things not regulated heavily by the government are still obtainable. It is the government that punishes people who don't get their insurance through their employer. The government does this through the tax code by denying people the tax deduction for health insurance that employers receive. Federal tax incentives also contribute to the world where many get their health insurance through employers.

One other thing is that the government does not allow purchasing of health insurance outside of the state you live in. This absolutely destroys the consumer's ability to say "You charge to much, I'm taking my business elsewhere." It also stops from what some people call "the free market" or sometimes I've heard it called "Capitalism."

So to really stick it to "ordinary" Americans, support government controlled health care.
Justify Full

4 comments:

  1. I'd like to say that health care didn't exist back in the days that the rights were written, and being the libertarian master constitution interpreter that you are allow me to pose the idea that if you are guaranteed the right to life, and there are things (such as vaccines, medicine, [HEALTH CARE]) that can be used to extend your life, wouldn't it be required by the government to supply the American people with it?

    Also, it sounds like you hate health care companies in general more than you hate the government health care option (which is no longer in the bill), so what are you complaining about? Isn't the health care reform now strictly happening only to make health care affordable? Not to universalize it?

    You also forgot to take into account a single thing about American's happiness and well being, which, after all, was the grounds our government was created on in the first place: making its citizens happy and healthy (or alive, at the very least).

    ReplyDelete
  2. First of all, I am not a Right to Lifer. And I don't hate healthcare companies, I hate the government regulation of them. The government can make healthcare more affordable by taking their hands off of it and let the free market take care of it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I guess I can agree with you on that to a certain extent. I don't think the government shouldn't regulate it at all though. I do believe you should have the option to have as minimal health care as you wish, there shouldn't be a pre-required amount.

    However, if you think of it like buying a car. You can get a shitty car that is completely horrible (just BARELY runs), but it'll still get you from A to B for $500 (estimation). Now, you can find cars for less than $500, but if they don't run, cant get you anywhere what is it good for? Directly relating this to health care, the government is pretty much just forcing you to buy a car that will work.
    I hope that makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I see what you are trying to say but, don't buy the car that won't get you anywhere then :) catch what I'm throwin'?

    ReplyDelete